Lost Music
I happened on a radio program called “Lost music of the 80’s” not too long ago. It was disappointing when after listening for a time I realised that I had heard before every song they were playing being as they were oft played singles in my youth. And I’ll hear them all again when oldies radio starts becoming a more attractive format to me. There is no danger of these songs being lost and I felt a more accurate title for the program would be “Big Hits of the 80’s”.
What I was expecting, based on the title, would be songs from albums that didn’t have great sales despite the great music they contained. Or early, obscure music from artists that became well established later on in their careers. Or even gems on big albums that weren’t picked as singles, so remaining undiscovered by new generations who don’t own or planning on owning that album. There is a plethora of recorded music lost in the album collections of the general public. Songs that would only be familiar to the completists.
Considering the amount of music that is produced as a ratio to the number of different songs broadcast, we have heard so very little. While, in part, the current function of a radio station is to expose you to new music, the other function is to expose you to it ad infitum, ad nauseum. So even if they do venture to play older songs, it’s older songs we’ve heard countless times before. To that end the modern radio format is not geared towards enriching our collective experience, but then we knew that already.
Not that any of this is to suggest that radio should re-invent itself to bring you ‘all novelty, all the time’. There are many sources to listen to which are esoteric or eclectic. Even more now than were available before the advent of internet, satellite and cable radio. It is naïve to expect that the business relationship between recording companies and commercial radio stations will change anytime soon, or even that it should. I would just like to see that when they do try to expand the listeners musical catalogue that it be an honest effort.
And this is just covering the modern recording era. If we venture further back in time there are countless songs recorded on vinyl, wax, paper, clay, etc that never see the light of day again. As a society it is impractical to store every datum that is produced. It is even more impractical to search and review the enormous storehouse of data. At the very least we may make modest attempts to gather a large cross-section of transient works. If for nothing else than to give us a fine-grained picture of the past. This is why I like sites such as Cylinder Preservation and Digitization Project or Open Source Audio that dedicate themselves to archiving and distributing ephemeral music. We get to hear what else was going on at a specific time other than much repeated ‘classics’, giving us a fuller view of the landscape.


I reckon some of the best songs are the ones on albums that never make the radio because they weren’t singles or whatever.
What I don’t understand is why radio always plays songs people know, and when they play songs longer than 3 minutes in length they always feel they need to edit them down. Sometimes I suspect they have them playing ever-so-slightly faster as well.
“Lost music of the 80’s” — is great title for radio program.
In my city we have also radio channel that is called — retro fm.
The radio business model is about selling ad-space. A song that is longer than 3 minutes eats into the time that is actually paid for. Radio stations want to have a high rotation of songs because no one will want to sit through 6 minutes of a song they don’t like, they’ll change the station. That’s bad news for the radio. So, as a radio station, you want to cram in as many different songs as you can in that space between paid airtime.
Playing unfamiliar songs carries it’s own risks too. Which is why the DJ’s always make a big fuss when they play a new single for the first time. If you have a proven catalogue of well liked music that’ll catch someone and make them stay then that’s what you use. Economics and cultural exploration don’t really go hand-in-hand. Sigh.